HB275 By Representative Tuggle RFD State Government Rd 1 12-MAR-15

SYNOPSIS: This bill would give public owners new alternative means for procuring design and construction services for public works contracts by making available the construction manager/general contractor and design-build project delivery methods as additional options when determined by the awarding authority that these alternative project delivery methods potentially offer better value to taxpayers than the design-bid-build method.

In addition to the existing design-bid-build project delivery method, this bill would provide awarding authorities the alternatives of selecting a construction manager/general contractor or a design-builder, would specify that a construction manager/general contractor or a design-builder assumes the risk for construction, rehabilitation, renovation, alteration, or repair of a public works project at the contracted price, and would set forth the selection process for the CM/GC and subcontractors necessary to complete a public works project by the construction manager/general contractor method and the selection process for the design-builder to complete a public works project by the design-build process. Furthermore, this bill would provide that prior experience as a construction manager/general contractor or a design-builder on a public project shall not be a criterion for qualification to be selected to submit a proposal on a construction manager/general contractor or design-build project.

Amendment 621 of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, now appearing as Section 111.05 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended, prohibits a general law whose purpose or effect would be to require a new or increased expenditure of local funds from becoming effective with regard to a local governmental entity without enactment by a 2/3 vote unless: it comes within one of a number of specified exceptions; it is approved by the affected entity; or the Legislature appropriates funds, or provides a local source of revenue, to the entity for the purpose.

The purpose or effect of this bill would be to require a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of the amendment. However, the bill does not require approval of a local governmental entity or enactment by a 2/3 vote to become effective because it comes within one of the specified exceptions contained in the amendment.

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Relating to public works projects; to designate existing Chapter 2, consisting of Sections 39-2-1 to 39-2-14, inclusive, of Title 39, Code of Alabama 1975, as Article 1 and add Articles 2 and 3, consisting of Sections 39-2-40 to 39-2-43 and 39-2-60 to 39-2-69, inclusive, to Chapter 2 of Title 39, Code of Alabama 1975; to amend Sections 39-2-1 and 39-2-2, Code of Alabama 1975, to authorize the selection by an awarding authority of a construction manager/general contractor or a design-builder; to specify that a construction manager/general contractor or a design-builder assumes the risk for construction, rehabilitation, renovation, alteration, or repair of a public works project; to provide for the selection of the contractors and subcontractors for the project by the construction manager/general contractor or a design-builder; to exclude all contracts to be awarded by the Alabama Department of Transportation, or a county or municipality for the construction or maintenance of a public road or highway, from Article 2 and Article 3 as created by this act; to provide penalties; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Amendment 621 of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, now appearing as Section 111.05 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:

Section 1. An article heading is added before Section 39-2-1 of the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows:

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL; DESIGN-BID-BUILD PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS.Section 2. Sections 39-2-1 and 39-2-2, as last amended by Acts 2014-373 and 2014-404, 2014 Regular Session, the Code of Alabama 1975, are amended to read as follows:

§39-2-1.

"As used in this title, the following words shall have the meanings ascribed to them as follows:

"(1) AWARDING AUTHORITY. Any governmental board, commission, agency, body, authority, instrumentality, department, or subdivision of the state, its counties and municipalities. This term includes, but shall not be limited to, the Department of Transportation, the State Building Commission, the State Board of Education, and any other entity contracting for public works. This term shall exclude the State Docks Department and any entity exempted from the competitive bid laws of the state by statute.

"(2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CM/GC). A person that provides construction management and general contractor services for an awarding authority for a project, pursuant to Article 2, through the preconstruction and construction phases of the project.

"(3) DESIGN-BUILDER. A person that performs or provides design-build services for an awarding authority for a project, pursuant to Article 3, through the preconstruction (including the performance or provision of the design of the project by licensed design professionals) and construction phases of the project.

"(4) DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. A registered architect or engineer, as appropriate, licensed in the State of Alabama.

"(2) (5) FORCE ACCOUNT WORK. Work paid for by reimbursing for the actual costs for labor, materials, and equipment usage incurred in the performance of the work, as directed, including a percentage for overhead and profit, where appropriate.

"(3) (6) LIFE CYCLE COSTS. The total cost of ownership over the extended life of a public works project, taking into consideration the costs of construction, operation, and maintenance, less any value obtained from salvage and quantifiable environmental benefits, or the sum of all recurring and one-time (non-recurring) costs over the full life span or a specified period of a good, service, structure, or system, including purchase price, installation costs, operating costs, maintenance and upgrade costs, and remaining (residual or salvage) value at the end of ownership or its useful life.

"(4) (7) PERSON. Natural persons, partnerships, limited liability companies, corporations, and other legal entities.

"(5) (8) PUBLIC PROPERTY. Real property which the state, county, municipality, or awarding authority thereof owns or has a contractual right to own or purchase, including easements, rights-of-way, or otherwise.

"(6) (9) PUBLIC WORKS. The construction, installation, repair, renovation, or maintenance of public buildings, structures, sewers, waterworks, roads, curbs, gutters, side walls, bridges, docks, underpasses, and viaducts as well as any other improvement to be constructed, installed, repaired, renovated, or maintained on public property and to be paid, in whole or in part, with public funds or with financing to be retired with public funds in the form of lease payments or otherwise.

§39-2-2.

"(a) Before entering into any contract for a public works involving an amount in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), the awarding authority shall advertise for sealed bids. If the awarding authority is the state or a county, or an instrumentality thereof, it shall advertise for sealed bids at least once each week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the improvement or some part thereof, is to be made. If the awarding authority is a municipality, or an instrumentality thereof, it shall advertise for sealed bids at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published in the municipality where the awarding authority is located. If no newspaper is published in the municipality, the awarding authority shall advertise by posting notice thereof on a bulletin board maintained outside the purchasing office and in any other manner and for the length of time as may be determined. In addition to bulletin board notice, sealed bids shall also be solicited by sending notice by mail to all persons who have filed a request in writing with the official designated by the awarding authority that they be listed for solicitation on bids for the public works contracts indicated in the request. If any person whose name is listed fails to respond to any solicitation for bids after the receipt of three such solicitations, the listing may be canceled. With the exception of the Department of Transportation, for all public works contracts involving an estimated amount in excess of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), awarding authorities shall also advertise for sealed bids at least once in three newspapers of general circulation throughout the state. The advertisements shall briefly describe the improvement, state that plans and specifications for the improvement are on file for examination in a designated office of the awarding authority, state the procedure for obtaining plans and specifications, state the time and place in which bids shall be received and opened, and identify whether prequalification is required and where all written prequalification information is available for review. All bids shall be opened publicly at the advertised time and place. No public work as defined in this chapter involving a sum in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) shall be split into parts involving sums of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or less for the purpose of evading the requirements of this section.

"(b)(1) An awarding authority may let contracts for public works involving fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or less with or without advertising or sealed bids.

"(2) An awarding authority may enter into a contract for public works if an advertisement for sealed bids for the contract was submitted by the awarding authority to a newspaper and the newspaper only publish the advertisement for two weeks if the authority can provide proof that it in good faith submitted the advertisement to the newspaper with instructions to publish the notice in accordance with the provisions of this section.

"(c) All contracts for public works entered into in violation of this title shall be null, void, and violative of public policy. Anyone who willfully violates this article concerning public works shall be guilty of a Class C felony.

"(d)(1) Excluded from the operation of this title shall be contracts with persons who shall perform only architectural, engineering, construction management, program management, or project management services in support of the public works and who shall not engage in actual construction, repair, renovation, or maintenance of the public works with their own forces, by contract, subcontract, purchase order, lease, or otherwise.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in Article 2 or Article 3, subsection (a) of this section, Section 39-2-3, subsections (a) and (d) of Section 39-2-4, and Sections 39-2-5, 39-2-6, and 39-2-11 do not apply to a contract for a public works project that is let using the CM/GC method provided in Article 2 or using the design-build method provided in Article 3. In addition, subsection (f) of this section shall not apply to a contract for a public works project that is let using the design-build method provided in Article 3. Except as otherwise provided in Article 2 and Article 3, the remaining provisions of this article shall apply to the CM/GC method and the design-build method.

"(e) In case of an emergency affecting public health, safety, or convenience, as declared in writing by the awarding authority, setting forth the nature of the danger to the public health, safety, or convenience which would result from delay, contracts may be let to the extent necessary to meet the emergency without public advertisement. The action and the reasons for the action taken shall immediately be made public by the awarding authority upon request.

"(f) No awarding authority may specify in the plans and specifications for the improvement the use of materials, products, systems, or services by a sole source unless all of the following requirements are met:

"(1) Except for contracts involving the construction, reconstruction, renovation, or replacement of public roads, bridges, and water and sewer facilities, the awarding authority can document to the satisfaction of the State Building Commission that the sole source product, material, system, or service is of an indispensable nature for the improvement, that there are no other viable alternatives, and that only this particular product, material, system, or service fulfills the function for which it is needed.

"(2) The sole source specification has been recommended by the architect or engineer of record as an indispensable item for which there is no other viable alternative.

"(3) All information substantiating the use of a sole source specification, including the recommendation of the architect or engineer of record, shall be documented and made available for examination in the office of the awarding authority at the time of advertisement for sealed bids.

"(g) In the event of a proposed public works project, acknowledged in writing by the Alabama Homeland Security Department as (1) having a direct impact on the security or safety of persons or facilities and (2) requiring confidential handling for the protection of such persons or facilities, contracts may be let without public advertisement but with the taking of informal bids otherwise consistent with the requirements of this title and the requirements of maintaining confidentiality. Records of bidding and award shall not be disclosed to the public, and shall remain confidential.

"(h) If a pre-bid meeting is held, the pre-bid meeting shall be held at least seven days prior to the bid opening except when the project has been declared an emergency in accordance with subsection (e).

"(i) The awarding authority may not offer a contract for bidding unless confirmation of any applicable grant has been received and any required matching funds have been secured by or are available to the awarding authority."

Section 3. Article 2, consisting of Sections 39-2-40 to 39-2-43, inclusive, is added to Chapter 2 of Title 39, Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows:

ARTICLE 2. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS.

§39-2-40.

In addition to the methods provided in Article 1 and Article 3 for awarding a public works contract, any contract for public works which, based on the awarding authority's preliminary budget or the awarding authority's design professional's estimate, involves an amount in excess of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) in anticipated construction costs, may be let by an awarding authority pursuant to the CM/GC method set forth in this article; provided, however, no contract for public works, regardless of amount, to be awarded by the Department of Transportation, or to be awarded by a county or municipality for the construction or maintenance of a public road or highway, may be let pursuant to the CM/GC method. Construction costs shall include all costs necessarily incurred in the proper performance of the construction of the public work including without limitation all permitting, management, supervisory, labor, subcontract, materials, equipment, and temporary facilities costs and any items which become permanently affixed or connected to the public work, but shall not include other project or program costs such as the cost of land acquisition or any items such as furniture or equipment which do not become permanently affixed or connected to the public work. Before an awarding authority proceeds with a CM/GC project, the awarding authority with the involvement of its design professional shall declare in writing why the CM/GC project delivery system is the preferred method for the particular project. The written statement shall identify the specific potential benefits to the public which the awarding authority reasonably believes will result from the use of the CM/GC delivery method and may include, without limitation, improvements in the quality, schedule, or cost of the particular project and shall be signed by the awarding authority's design professional. The written statement shall also state the funds available for the project. The written statement shall be prepared and made available on request before proceeding with the CM/GC prequalification and it must be included in the advertisement requesting submission of qualifications and proposals required by Section 39-2-42(a).

§39-2-41.

For the purposes of this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(1) CM/GC SERVICES. Services provided by a person that:

a. Provides construction management services for a specific, single project throughout the preconstruction and construction phases or for any portion thereof. For the purposes of this article, a specific, single project is a project that is constructed at a single location or at a common location so long as for a single project.

b. During the construction phase, acts as a general contractor in accordance with the CM/GC contract.

c. Performs or provides for the performance of the work on the project and guarantees the maximum cost of the project.

(2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Services provided by a construction manager, which may include, but are not necessarily limited to, design/constructability review, preparation and coordination of bid packages, scheduling, cost control, value engineering, preconstruction services, construction administration, and construction services.

§39-2-42.

(a) A CM/GC shall be selected after advertising in accordance with the procedure provided in subsection (a) of Section 39-2-2 (other than the requirement for sealed bids) and prequalification conducted by the awarding authority or its agent in accordance with the procedures provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) of Section 39-2-4. The final selection must be made from among those who prequalify. The CM/GC must be properly licensed prior to submitting for prequalification. Those who prequalify are then eligible to submit competitive proposals to the awarding authority or its agent. The criteria to be used for prequalification and the content of the request for competitive proposals, including the criteria for final selection, shall be prepared with the involvement and participation of the awarding authority's design professional, or design professionals, who shall be retained by the awarding authority for observation of construction requirements as required by law. Nothing herein is intended to nor shall it be construed as to require or permit an awarding authority to contract with a design professional, at any tier, on any basis other than a qualifications-based selection process. The final selection of those CM/GCs who prequalify to submit competitive proposals shall be based upon the awarding authority's written findings and conclusions regarding the CM/GC's qualifications and responsibility including, without limitation, specific evaluations regarding the CM/GC's demonstrated competence on similar projects, experience specifically relating to similar projects, financial ability, past performance, relevant safety record, proposed personnel and methodology for the project, and other specific factors that demonstrate the capability of the CM/GC to perform the subject project; provided, however, that prior experience as a construction manager/general contractor on a public project shall not be a criterion for prequalification to submit a competitive proposal. If the awarding authority contracts with an agent to conduct the prequalification or the receipt and review of competitive proposals, the agent, including a subsidiary thereof or any entity under any degree of common ownership with the agent, is not eligible to perform the CM/GC work on the project or work as a subcontractor, at any tier, on the project. Following the awarding authority's establishment of a list of those persons which prequalify, but sufficiently in advance of the submission of competitive proposals for all prequalified persons to respond, the awarding authority shall provide in writing to all prequalified persons the criteria upon which the competitive proposals shall be scored and the percentage valuation that will be assigned to each element in the final selection criteria and shall state the date for submission of the competitive proposals so that those submitting competitive proposals know how each criterion shall be weighted. The criteria are left to the awarding authority's and design professional's discretion but shall be compiled to enable the awarding authority to make an informed selection of the CM/GC best qualified for the particular needs of the project and may include but are not necessarily limited to: the CM/GC's experience with similar types of construction; the CM/GC's proposed project management team including their prior experience with similar types of construction and scope of services provided; the CM/GC's experience with other public works projects; the CM/GC's other projects in progress and ability to perform additional work; the CM/GC's prior schedule performance, proposed schedule for the project and possible schedule improvements for the project; the CM/GC's prior cost control performance, proposed cost control procedures for the project, and proposed cost savings and value engineering; the CM/GC's prior or current work in the location of the project; the CM/GC's quality assurance and quality control programs and performance and any proposals to add or improve quality; the CM/GC's proposed methodology for achieving woman-owned business enterprise, minority-owned business enterprise, and disadvantaged-owned business enterprise goals, if any; and the CM/GC's financial condition, insurability and bonding capacity. The competitive proposals shall respond to the criteria established by the awarding authority, and they shall be scored by the awarding authority and its design professional under a qualifications based analysis. The awarding authority shall then review the proposals and rank them from first to last and shall prepare in writing the ranking together with the score for each competitive proposal received indicating the score each criterion received and a written narrative describing the basis for the selection and the ranking. The awarding authority is not required to make its ranking or final selection of CM/GC based solely on lowest price, or any component of price or fee. The awarding authority shall then enter into negotiations with the CM/GC having the highest ranked competitive proposal to finalize the terms of a CM/GC contract.

(b) Pursuant to a CM/GC contract, the person providing CM/GC services may self-perform portions of a project provided the aggregate total cost of all the work the CM/GC plans to self-perform, not including the general conditions items, does not exceed 10 percent of the guaranteed maximum price (at the time the final contract is awarded). General conditions costs are those costs incurred by the CM/GC for work that is necessary to perform the project but does not become an integral or permanent part of the finished project. General conditions costs shall include preconstruction services. For purposes of determining the aggregate total cost of self-performed work, the total cost shall include all costs reasonably necessary for the proper performance of the self-performed work including, without limitation, the total sum of all labor, materials, tools, equipment, trade supervision, layout, taxes, and bond and insurance premium (when and if required). In addition, for purposes of compliance with the 10 percent limitation, work subcontracted to a separate entity in which the CM/GC has any ownership interest or is under common ownership with the CM/GC shall be considered self-performed work. Notwithstanding the foregoing 10 percent limitation, the CM/GC may self-perform additional work on the project in the event a subcontractor or subcontractors is terminated for default, is deemed by the CM/GC to be non-performing or underperforming some portion of the subcontract scope of work, or is otherwise not materially complying with the subcontract requirements such as to require the CM/GC to supplement the subcontractor's work by self-performing some portion of the subcontractor's scope of work, or if there are no subcontractors who bid or submit proposals for some portion of the work. If all bids or proposals received for a particular scope of work to be subcontracted exceed the proposed budget for that work, the CM/GC shall negotiate with the lowest bidder or proposer to attempt to obtain a price at or below the proposed budget amount. If the CM/GC is unable to negotiate a price within the proposed budget amount, then the CM/GC may, at its option and discretion, perform that scope of work itself or apply savings or contingency amounts from another line item in the proposed budget sufficient to bring the work within the proposed budget amount.

(c) A person providing CM/GC services is subject to all licensing, insurance, and bonding requirements for public works projects in Alabama.

§39-2-43.

(a) Within 30 days after ranking the competitive proposals, the awarding authority shall notify in writing the CM/GC having the highest ranked competitive proposal for the purpose of entering into a CM/GC contract. The letter of intent to award the project issued by the awarding authority shall describe the services to be performed and the proposed compensation.

(b) Within 30 days of receipt of the awarding authority's letter of intent, the CM/GC shall present to the awarding authority a proposed date by which the guaranteed maximum price shall be agreed upon together with staffing costs for the CM/GC, other proposed general conditions costs, and the fee for CM/GC services. The awarding authority may accept, reject, or continue to negotiate with the CM/GC to reach a contract agreement; however, if the negotiation is not completed within 90 days after issuance of the awarding authority's letter of intent to award, the awarding authority and CM/GC must agree in writing to an extension of time.

(c) If the awarding authority is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the initially selected CM/GC, the awarding authority shall terminate negotiations with the CM/GC and withdraw the letter of intent to award. If the awarding authority decides to proceed with the public works project, the awarding authority shall issue a letter of intent to the next highest ranked CM/GC and proceed as outlined above until an acceptable agreement on contract terms is reached. This process may proceed with respect to each prequalified CM/GC in the order in which the CM/GC was ranked by the awarding authority. However, if the awarding authority is unable to award a contract to a CM/GC within 120 days of ranking the competitive proposals, all proposals shall expire unless at least one ranked CM/GC agrees in writing to a stipulated extension of time for consideration of its proposal. Alternatively, if at any point before contracting with the CM/GC the awarding authority decides it is in the project's or the public's best interest, it may choose to let a contract for the project in accordance with Article 1 or Article 3 or it may cancel the project.

(d) Once the awarding authority reaches an agreement on contract terms with the CM/GC selected, the awarding authority and CM/GC shall enter a written contract for the specific, single project advertised and negotiated. The contract shall be written by the awarding authority with the involvement of its design professional using as the basis for the contract either an industry standard form developed for a CM/GC project or a form for a CM/GC project used or promulgated by the state.

(e) The CM/GC shall contract with subcontractors for all work which the CM/GC does not intend to self-perform as follows:

(1) For the selection of subcontractors whose contract is not expected to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) in amount, the CM/GC shall have sole discretion in the manner, method, and conditions of selection. The project shall not be divided into subcontracts of less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for the purpose of evading the prequalification selection process or any other provisions of this title.

(2) Other than subcontractors awarded in accordance with (1) above or (3) below, for all subcontracts greater than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) the CM/GC shall prequalify all subcontractors and shall solicit lump sum bids from the subcontractors who prequalify. Based on its review and analysis of the bids received, the CM/GC shall identify the subcontractors it intends to contract with on a lump sum basis and shall submit the list to the awarding authority. Additional subcontractors may be added to the list as they are identified by the CM/GC. The awarding authority may object to the use of particular subcontractors; provided, however, if the awarding authority's rejection of a particular subcontract results in additional cost or time or both, the CM/GC may be entitled to an increase in the contract time or GMP or both.

(3) The CM/GC may desire to select certain subcontractors before the scope of work is defined well enough for subcontractors to submit lump sum bids. In such case, the subcontractor may be selected solely on the basis of the subcontractor's qualifications. The CM/GC shall prequalify all such subcontractors using a prequalification procedure which is consistent with the requirements in Section 39-2-4. The list of prequalified subcontractors shall be submitted to the awarding authority and the design professional by the CM/GC. Within 10 days of receipt of the list of subcontractors, the awarding authority may provide comments on or reject the selection of any proposed subcontractors based upon a past experience, prior or current legal dispute the awarding authority may have with a subcontractor or for other reasonable cause; provided, however, should the awarding authority's rejection of any proposed subcontractor result in additional cost or time that exceeds the awarded contract amount, the CM/GC may be entitled to compensation for any such additional costs or time that resulted from the substitution of a proposed subcontractor. The CM/GC shall then receive competitive proposals from the subcontractors who have prequalified. Prior to the submission of competitive proposals, the CM/GC shall establish the criteria upon which the competitive proposals shall be scored. Each criterion shall be assigned a percentage of the total score and shall be submitted to the awarding authority and its design professional for approval. After approval by the awarding authority but sufficiently in advance of the submission of proposals, the CM/GC shall provide the criteria and percentage valuation that will be assigned to each element to the subcontractors submitting competitive proposals and shall state the date for submission of the competitive proposals. The competitive proposals shall respond to the criteria upon which the CM/GC's selection shall be based. The CM/GC shall rank the proposals received from first to last and shall submit in writing to the awarding authority the ranking together with the score for each competitive proposal indicating the score each criterion received and a written narrative describing the basis for the selection and the ranking. Based on the competitive proposals ranking, the CM/GC shall select the subcontractors with whom it intends to perform the project. The CM/GC shall not be required to base its selection of subcontractors solely on lowest price, or any component of price or fee; however, if price, or any component thereof, is used as a selection criterion for any particular subcontractor, the CM/GC shall provide the awarding authority, in writing, reasonable cause for choosing a subcontractor not having the lowest price.

(f) All contracts for public works entered into in violation of this title shall be null, void, and violative of public policy. Anyone who willfully violates this article concerning public works shall be guilty of a Class C felony.

(g) All proceedings, records, proposals, contracts, and other documents relating to the contracting for public works under this article shall be public records. Upon request of an interested citizen, the awarding authority shall make available for inspection any and all such documents.

Section 4. Article 3, consisting of Sections 39-2-60 to 39-2-69, inclusive, is added to Chapter 2 of Title 39, Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows:

ARTICLE 3. DESIGN BUILD PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS.

§39-2-60.

In addition to the methods provided in Articles 1 and 2 for awarding a public works contract, any contract for public works which, based on the awarding authority's preliminary budget or design professional's estimate, involves an amount in excess of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) in design and construction costs, may be let pursuant to the design-build method set forth in this article; provided, however, no contract for public works, regardless of amount, to be awarded by the Department of Transportation, or to be awarded by a county or municipality for the construction or maintenance of a public road or highway, may be let pursuant to the design-build method. The design and construction costs shall include all costs necessarily incurred in the proper performance of a complete design and the proper performance of construction including without limitation all permitting, management, supervisory, labor, subcontract, materials, equipment, and temporary facilities costs and any items which become permanently affixed or connected to the public work, but shall not include other project or program costs such as the cost of land acquisition or any items such as furniture or equipment which do not become permanently affixed or connected to the public work. Before an awarding authority may proceed with a design-build project, the awarding authority with the involvement of its design professional, or design professionals, shall declare in writing why the design-build project delivery system is the preferred method for the particular project, it shall be signed by the awarding authority's design professional, or design professionals, and it must be included in the advertisement requesting submission of qualifications and proposals required by Section 39-2-2(a). The written statement shall also state the funds available for the project.

§39-2-61.

For the purposes of this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(1) DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES. Services performed or provided by a design-builder that:

a. Performs or provides the project design and construction management services for a specific, single project throughout the design, preconstruction and construction phases. For the purposes of this article, a specific, single project is a project that is constructed at a single location or at a common location so long as for a single project.

b. During the design phase, performs or provides the project design which must be performed by a full team of licensed design professionals representing the engineering and architectural disciplines required by the needs of the specific project. Nothing herein, however, is intended to nor shall it be construed as to require or permit the design-builder to contract with design professionals, at any tier, on any basis other than a qualifications-based selection.

c. During the construction phase, acts as a general contractor in accordance with the design-build contract. Services may include, without limitation, scheduling, cost control, value engineering, evaluation, preconstruction services, construction administration (provided that the observation of construction requirements are performed by the licensed design professionals of record as required by law), and construction services pursuant to a single contract.

d. Performs or provides both the design and construction of the work on the project either for a lump sum or for a guaranteed maximum cost for the project.

§39-2-62.

(a) The awarding authority shall engage a licensed design professional in the design-build team prequalification and selection process. The design professional shall include a full, professional design team that includes all major engineering disciplines involved in the proposed project. The design professional and its full professional team shall be retained by the awarding authority for observation of construction requirements as required by law and until the project is completed and accepted by the awarding authority. The design professional, with the involvement of its full professional team, shall: develop a scope of work that defines the project and the awarding authority's requirements; be involved in the preparation of the prequalification criteria and final selection criteria; be involved in the evaluation and scoring of the prequalification and final selection criteria; and provide technical reviews, project oversight and other technical project administration services to the awarding authority for the duration of the project. The design professional and its full professional team shall also assist the awarding authority in developing the proposed budget for the project. The awarding authority may use in-house design professionals, but if the awarding authority contracts with an agent, the agent must be selected as set forth in Section 41-16-72(3). If the awarding authority contracts with an agent, the agent, including a subsidiary thereof or any entity under common ownership with the agent, is not eligible to perform or provide the design-build work on the project, including performing work as a subcontractor, or subconsultant, at any tier, to the design-builder.

(b) A design-builder shall be selected after advertising in accordance with the procedure provided in subsection (a) of Section 39-2-2 (other than the requirement for sealed bids) and two-step prequalification and selection process conducted by the awarding authority or its agent in accordance with the procedure provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) of Section 39-2-4 and Section 41-16-72(3), respectively. The final selection must be made from among those who prequalify. The design-builder and the design professional whom the design-builder intends to be the lead design professional of record for the project must be properly licensed as required by law prior to submitting for prequalification. Those who prequalify may then submit competitive proposals to the awarding authority or its agent as directed by the awarding authority.

(c) An awarding authority wishing to undertake a design-build project shall prepare a written request for qualifications from potential design-builders. At a minimum, the request for qualifications shall be published in accordance with the advertising requirements set forth in subsection (a) of Section 39-2-2 (other than the requirement for sealed bids) and shall be widely disseminated to the professional community in a full and open manner. The request for qualifications shall include the scope of work prepared by the awarding authority's design professional and its full professional team describing the specific requirements and nature of the project; the prequalification criteria and the percentage valuation that will be assigned to each criterion; and shall state the date for submission of the prequalification submittal. In addition, the request for qualifications shall state the stipulated proposal fee which the awarding authority intends to pay, if any, to each of the prequalified design-builders who are selected and submit final qualification proposals. The selection of the design-builders who prequalify to submit competitive proposals shall be based upon the awarding authority's written findings and conclusions regarding the design-builder's qualifications and responsibility, including without limitation, specific findings regarding the (1) the design-builder's full professional team of licensed design professionals and their respective specialized expertise, capabilities, and technical competence with similar types of construction and the scope of services provided on similar previous projects; (2) proposed project team including the name and qualifications of the project team members; (3) the design-builder's proposed project management team's record of past performance and prior experience with similar projects and types of construction including quality of work, ability to meet schedules, cost control and contract administration; (4) the design-builder's quality assurance and quality control programs and prior performance; (5) the design-builder's other projects in progress and ability to perform additional work; (6) resources available to perform the work, including any specialized services within the specified time limits for the project; (7) the design-builder's responsibility, competency, experience, safety record, financial condition, insurability and bonding capacity; (8) availability to and familiarity with the project locale; (9) the design-builder's experience with other public works projects; provided, however, prior experience as a design-builder on a public project shall not necessarily be a criterion for qualification to submit a final proposal provided the design-builder has prior design-build experience on private projects and construction experience on projects of similar size and scope.

(d) From the prequalification data submitted, the awarding authority and its design professional, with the involvement of its full professional team, shall then review the prequalification data submitted and shall prequalify up to five potential design-builders from whom to request competitive proposals. While the awarding authority and design professional may prequalify fewer than five potential design-builders, a minimum of three design-builders must be prequalified to proceed with the design-builder selection process. The awarding authority shall prepare written findings and conclusions regarding the awarding authority's assessment of the qualifications of each design-builder who responds to the request for qualifications.

(e) Following the awarding authority's establishment of a list of those design-builders who prequalify, but at least 45 days in advance of the submission of final proposals, the awarding authority shall provide in writing to all prequalified design-builders the criteria upon which the competitive proposals shall be scored and the percentage valuation that will be assigned to each element in the final selection criteria and shall state the date for submission of the competitive proposals so that those submitting competitive proposals know how each criterion shall be weighted. The awarding authority shall also include the minimum score required for a competitive proposal to be technically acceptable. The final qualification criteria are left to the awarding authority and awarding authority's design professional's, with the involvement of its full professional team, discretion but shall be related to the specific project requirements. The criteria shall be compiled to enable the awarding authority to make an informed selection of the design-builder best qualified for the particular needs of the project and may include but are not necessarily limited to: (1) the design-builder's project design concepts; (2) proposed design approach and technical solutions; (3) proposed project management approach; (4) proposed project team members including key personnel, project team organization, project team management and assignment of specific project responsibilities; (5) proposed project enhancements including design approach, schedule improvements, added quality or proposed cost savings for the project; (6) proposed project schedule including significant project milestones and (7) the design-builder's proposed methodology for achieving woman-owned business enterprise, enterprise of small business, as defined in Section 25-10-3, minority-owned business enterprise, and disadvantaged-owned business enterprise goals, if any. Each prequalified design-builder shall also submit a sealed proposal with the proposed lump sum or guaranteed maximum price. The awarding authority shall not open the sealed proposal until after the final proposals have been scored.

(f) The final proposals shall respond to the criteria upon which the awarding authority's selection shall be based, and they shall be scored based on the awarding authority's analysis of each potential design-builder's proposal. Proposals that do not meet the minimum score established by the awarding authority shall not be technically acceptable and the design-builder shall not be eligible for award. The awarding authority shall then open and score the sealed proposals of the responsive proposals. The awarding authority shall then rank the technically acceptable proposals from first to last, based on the total cumulative score. The awarding authority is not required to make its final ranking based solely on lowest price or any component of price. The awarding authority shall maintain a written record of the ranking together with the score for each proposal received indicating the score each criterion received and a written narrative describing the basis for the selection and the ranking.

(g) If the sealed proposal of the first-ranked design-builder is within the awarding authority's proposed budget, then the awarding authority shall proceed with entering into a design-build contract with the successful design-builder. If the sealed proposal from the first ranked design-builder is not within the awarding authority's proposed budget, the awarding authority shall proceed to the second-ranked design-builder. If the sealed proposal of the second-ranked design-builder is not within the awarding authority's proposed budget, then the awarding authority shall proceed to the sealed proposal of the third-ranked design-builder. If the sealed proposal of the third-ranked design-builder is not within the awarding authority's proposed budget, then the awarding authority may proceed in order to the fourth-ranked and fifth-ranked design-builders' proposals, respectively. If none of the sealed proposals are within the awarding authority's proposed budget, then the awarding authority shall reject all proposals. The awarding authority may then let the contract for the project pursuant to Article 1 or Article 2 or may cancel the project; however, the awarding authority may not proceed under the design-build method described in this section without revising the project scope and project budget and starting with the advertisement of a new request for prequalification. In addition, any of the criteria provided in any previous qualification and selection process may not be considered if the project is re-advertised.

§39-2-63.

A person, corporation, or entity providing design-build services is subject to all licensing, insurance, and bonding requirements for public works projects in Alabama.

§39-2-64.

(a) Within 30 days of opening the sealed proposal from the successful design-builder, the awarding authority, shall enter a written design-build contract, prepared by the awarding authority with the involvement of its design professional, with the design-builder for design-build services. As the basis for the contract, the awarding authority shall use an industry standard form developed for design-build projects or a form for a design-build project used or promulgated by the state. The design-builder's final proposal, including the proposed design concept, proposed schedule, proposed project team members, and guaranteed maximum price shall be incorporated into the award of the design-build contract. The awarding authority shall have the right to terminate the design-build contract for failure to comply substantially with the final proposal and accepted price.

(b) After award of the design-build contract and in accordance with the proposed project schedule, the design-builder shall present the final design to the awarding authority and the awarding authority's design professional, with full involvement of its full professional team, for approval. Within 30 days of receiving the final design, the awarding authority and the awarding authority's design professional, with full involvement of its full professional team, must provide written comments to the design-builder and the awarding authority must either approve or reject the final design. The design-builder must have the awarding authority's written approval of the final design before proceeding with any construction. If the design-builder proposes that the project will be constructed in phases, then the design-builder must present the final design for each phase of the work and must have the awarding authority's written approval of each proposed phase before the design-builder can proceed with the proposed phase of construction.

(c) The awarding authority shall have the right to terminate the design-build contract if the design-builder cannot provide a final design that substantially complies with the accepted final proposal and the project requirements.

§39-2-65.

The design-builder shall be responsible for complying with all applicable laws, codes and regulations. The awarding authority shall not be responsible for the design-builder's failure to comply.

§39-2-66.

Within 90 days after the awarding authority publishes the rankings of the competitive proposals, each prequalified design-builder who submitted a responsive, competitive proposal shall be paid the proposal fee which the competitive proposal criteria stipulated, if any. If the awarding authority elects to pay a stipulated proposal fee, the amount shall be set forth in the request for qualifications. The awarding authority's design professional shall review the proposal requirements and shall recommend to the awarding authority the amount of the fee based on the design professional's opinion of the required effort. The proposal fee shall not be paid to the successful design-builder nor shall the proposal fee be paid to any proposer whose proposal was not technically acceptable as determined by the awarding authority and its design professional.

§39-2-67.

All proceedings, records, proposals, contracts, and other documents relating to the contracting for public works under this article shall be public records. Upon request of an interested citizen, the awarding authority shall make available for inspection any and all such documents.

§39-2-68.

All contracts for public works entered into in violation of this article shall be null, void, and violative of public policy. Anyone who willfully violates this article concerning public works shall be guilty of a Class C felony.

§39-2-69.

The Attorney General, a bona fide unsuccessful or disqualified bidder or proposer on a CM/GC or a design-build project, or any interested citizen may maintain an action to enjoin the letting or execution of any public works contract in violation of or contrary to the provisions of this title or any other statute and may enjoin payment of any public funds under any such contract. In the case of a successful action brought by a bidder or proposer on a CM/GC or design-build project, reasonable bid or proposal preparation costs shall be recoverable by that bidder or proposer. The action shall be commenced within 45 days of the contract award.

Section 5. Although this bill would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds, the bill is excluded from further requirements and application under Amendment 621, now appearing as Section 111.05 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended, because the bill defines a new crime or amends the definition of an existing crime.